Daniel Taub’s Reasons why Iran would still become a Nuclear State Despite the Agreement

Daniel Taub is an internationally recognized lawyer and an Israeli diplomat. He was born in Great Britain. He studied in Great Britain. In 1989, Daniel Taub moved to Israeli and had since served in different positions in Israeli. In 1991, he was appointed as the minister for the foreign affairs in Israel.

He was appointed as the ambassador of Israeli to the United Kingdom in 2011; he served as an ambassador until the year 2015. He is now the director of strategy and planning of the Yad Hanadiv foundation.

When serving as the ambassador of Israel to the United Kingdom, Daniel Taub was displeased by the Geneva deal which was signed between the Western capitals and Iran. Israel and Daniel Taub held the same view that the deal was not going to stop Iran from becoming a nuclear state.

While talking to the ‘The Independent,’ Daniel Taub said that the effect of the Geneva accord was going to be minimal, he noted that by the end of the six months period, Iran might even be closer into becoming a nuclear state. Daniel Taub said that the situation would have forced Israel to make alliances with some of the unthinkable nations.

That would have been possible because all these nations are not happy with the agreement. The issue reminded most countries that they had much in common, if only they could overcome their immediate differences. He said that Israeli would be interested in deepening their relationship based on this matter. Read more: Daniel Taub | LinkedIn and Daniel Taub | Ideamench

The relationship between Israeli and Western allies remained strong despite their stand on the Geneva accord. Israelis were surprised by the fact that the agreement had already raised some confusion in less than a day since its signing.

The Western Capitals claim that the agreement did not enshrine Iran’s right to the enrichment while Iran claims it did. Israelis became furious with the Geneva accord when they realized that there had been secret negotiations between Washington and Tehran. Learn more about Daniel Taub: http://askreporter.com/2017/09/religion-should-have-a-place-at-the-negotiating-table-says-israeli-negotiator-daniel-taub/ and http://frenchtribune.com/avis/25611-ambassador-daniel-taub-unravels-balfour-declaration

The talks involved the Israelis hater Ahmadinejad regime, an indication that Americans were directly communicating with him. Israel said that the agreement would not bring a long lasting solution since it is built in deception.

The Prime Minister of Israeli Benjamin Netanyahu called President Barack Obama in what was termed as an angry phone call between the two. Israel was sure that when it comes about the issue of Iran having a nuclear weapon, they would have closer ties than the US to challenge such a move.